General Information Company Information Create My Account

Free 5-day trial.

Once you sign-up, you can add 4 additional team members within your EZGovOpps Portal. If you have a team member that already has an EZGovOpps account, ask them to get add you. If you sign-up for your own trial you will not be able to experience the extensive collaboration tools that are available within EZGovOpps.

First name:

Last name:




Company Information


Primary NAICS:

Postal Code:


How did you hear about EZGovOpps?:
If your selection has a * symbol,please
share more details as to your selected choice

Do you have a unique socio economic status?:
Small Business
Total Small Business
Emerging Small Business
Economically Disadvantaged WOSB

Is your company registered with the Federal Government (
Not Sure

Create Account

Referred By:

Your trial will expire at Midnight on .

I agree to the EZGovOpps Terms of Service
    Terms and Conditions
I am also interested in SLED (State, Local and Educational) opportunities. Please create credentials for the SLED portal for me

Congratulations! Your 5-Day free trial awaits.

Your activation email should arrive in a few minutes.
If you don't see it, please check Spam/Clutter.

Step 1) Validate Sign-Up via Email Step 2) Login to EZGovOpps Step 3) Experience EZGovOpps free!
Need assistance? EZGovOpps Ultimate Member Support can be reached by email at

Schedule a personalized demo to enhance your evalution.

EZGovOpps Member Portal Secure Log In

Enter your email address and we will send you password reset instructions.

Get started with your free 5 day trial.

8(a) Program Applications Suspended by SBA over Ruling

8(a) Program Applications Suspended by SBA over Ruling


8a Program Suspended after Ruling

SBA website. Postmodern Studio –

The long-standing 8(a) program by the Small Business Administration (SBA) is poised for significant transformations after a court decision challenged the methodology used by an agency to determine a company’s social disadvantage status. The 8(a) Business Development program supports enterprises that are predominantly owned by U.S. citizens who are socially and/or economically disadvantaged to effectively compete within the federal marketplace. Underrepresented minority groups, including Black Americans, Hispanic Americans, Native Americans, Asian Pacific Americans, Subcontinent Asian Americans, and other groups recognized by the SBA, are not required to provide evidence of social disadvantage during the 8(a) program application process.

Last month, the case of Ultima Services Corp. versus the Agriculture Department raised questions about the “rebuttable presumption” approach, which permitted the SBA to admit firms into the 8(a) program without compelling proof of their disadvantaged status. Ultima, not being an 8(a) enterprise, lost a contract when the Agriculture Department deemed them ineligible for the recompete. In contrast, an 8(a) firm received a sole-source contract award. Ultima filed a lawsuit against both the SBA and the Agriculture Department, alleging that their 5th amendment rights to equal protection under the law were violated. Ultima contended that designating its contract as an 8(a) set-aside unjustly discriminated against them.

Judge Clifton Corker, presiding in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee, ruled in favor of Ultima. The judge stated that both the SBA and Agriculture failed to rigorously scrutinize the decision to assign the Agriculture Department contract to an 8(a) firm. Additionally, it was not established that Ultima was unaffected by the choice to set aside its contract, essentially precluding them from competing for it. The Agriculture Department’s stance was undermined by the fact that one of its contracting officers actively sought an SBA office willing to approve the contract’s 8(a) set-aside designation.

Initially, one office conducted an evaluation and concluded that Ultima would suffer adverse consequences, advising against the change. The contracting officer then approached a different SBA office, which consented to the 8(a) set-aside request. The judge also referenced a recent Supreme Court ruling regarding affirmative action in college admissions, asserting that the SBA had not adequately considered how this ruling influenced its administration of the 8(a) program. While the SBA argued that its 8(a) program adhered to legal precedents, the judge emphasized that the program had not been reevaluated since 1986.

As a result, the SBA has temporarily halted the submission of new 8(a) applications. Presently, there is no indication of an immediate impact on existing socially disadvantaged small businesses enrolled in the 8(a) program. A videoconference involving all parties in the case is scheduled for August 31st to discuss potential remedies, as per the court’s directives.

To find out what companies have recently been added to the 8(a) program, or which are set to graduate soon, visit the Company search in EZGovOpps using the 8(a) Certification Entry/Exit criteria. It’s very handy for teaming purposes. Get started here.

Leave a Reply